What should a scope of supply matrix contain?
Start with the current document index, scope specification, drawings, equipment schedules, returnables and addenda. Make one row for each deliverable or activity whose responsibility can be checked separately. Record the source document, revision and section; an unsupported row remains open.
The matrix below is a working review structure, not a contract form. Keep proposed bid treatment separate from confirmed buyer requirements. A blank cell means the team has not resolved the boundary; it does not mean an item is excluded.
| Field | What to record | Review question |
|---|---|---|
| Item or activity | Equipment tag, work item or record | Can another reviewer identify the exact deliverable? |
| Responsibility | Supply, install, test, commission or document | Which party owns each activity? |
| Boundary | Start and end points, including interfaces | Where does the next party take over? |
| Source | Document, revision and section or drawing detail | Is this the current issued requirement? |
| Bid treatment | Included, proposed exclusion or open | Has the appropriate reviewer approved it? |
| Closure | Question ID, response reference and owner | Has the answer reached the estimate and response? |
How does this work for an electrical equipment package?
Illustrative example. A synthetic switchboard enquiry asks for equipment supply, while the accompanying drawing shows site cable connections. The table records questions the bid team must resolve. It does not assign those responsibilities on a real project.
Split equipment supply from unloading, positioning, termination, testing and handover. They may sit with different parties. Do the same for accessories, documents and attendance: an equipment line item does not show whether these activities have been allowed for.
| Activity | Boundary to confirm | Evidence needed |
|---|---|---|
| Equipment supply | Board and separately scheduled accessories | Current equipment schedule and supplier response |
| Delivery and positioning | Delivery point, unloading and final placement | Issued logistics requirement and responsibility |
| Cable termination | Incoming and outgoing connection work | Approved connection details and installation scope |
| Testing attendance | Factory records, site checks and witness attendance | Project test requirements and attendance allocation |
| Documentation | Drawing revisions, manuals and test records | Issued document deliverables and submission dates |
What should happen when two tender sources disagree?
Illustrative example. The synthetic equipment schedule includes an accessory, but a supplier's returned quotation marks it excluded. Retain both references and raise one clear question about the required supply boundary. Record any interim estimating allowance as an assumption awaiting approval.
Do not silently remove the accessory, assume that the cheapest quotation is complete or decide document precedence from habit. The authorised contracts and technical reviewers determine the treatment using the issued terms and formal clarifications. This is a document review method, not legal advice.
When the answer arrives, update the affected scope row, supplier enquiry, quote comparison, estimate and bid qualification together. A question is still operationally open if the response was received but the pricing basis has not changed.
How should addenda change the matrix?
Keep the superseded source reference in the change record and link the replacement requirement to the affected rows. Review changes to quantities, equipment, interfaces, tests and documentation, including rows that were previously closed.
For Australian Commonwealth procurements covered by the additional rules, Finance's request-documentation guidance includes scope, specifications and delivery dates. Its amendment guidance requires changes to be shared with known participants in time for them to amend submissions. Those rules have a defined scope; check the actual procurement instructions for other tenders.
- Identify the new issue and the source it replaces.
- List affected activities and responsibility boundaries.
- Reopen dependent questions and supplier responses.
- Record the approved estimate and submission changes.
- Confirm the final bid uses the reviewed source set.
What must be checked before the scope is issued?
The bid lead should be able to trace every material inclusion or proposed exclusion to a current source, see the owner of each unresolved boundary and identify where the approved position appears in the final submission. Match the register to the supplier enquiries and estimate rather than treating it as a separate summary.
Document preparation does not approve a technical design or contractual departure. Engineering sign-off is performed only by the registered engineer on the job. Keep unresolved technical information visible for that review.
Common questions
What else should the bid team know?
Is a scope of supply the same as a bill of quantities?
No. A quantity list measures items. A scope of supply also records responsibility for installation, testing, documentation and interfaces.
Does an exclusion in a supplier quote change the buyer's requirement?
No. It identifies a difference to resolve. Record the issued requirement, supplier position and approved bid treatment separately.
Can an unanswered scope question be treated as an exclusion?
Do not treat silence as an agreed exclusion. Keep the question open and obtain the appropriate review of any proposed qualification under the tender instructions.
Who approves the completed scope of supply?
The bid lead coordinates approval, with authorised technical, estimating and contracts reviewers checking their respective responsibilities. Engineering sign-off remains with the registered engineer on the job.
Primary sources
- Commonwealth Procurement Rules: request documentation and amendmentsAustralian Government Department of Finance